Recent Comments


The Newspaper for the Future of Miami
Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
Front Page » Transportation » Ratings of new Miami-Dade Transit bonds indicate ‘resilience’

Ratings of new Miami-Dade Transit bonds indicate ‘resilience’

Written by on August 11, 2020
Ratings of new Miami-Dade Transit bonds indicate ‘resilience’

Fitch Ratings has given a pair of new Miami-Dade transit bond series that together total about $790 million “AA” ratings and “stable” outlooks despite an economic downturn that the agency says will worsen before it improves.

In an Aug. 3 report, the credit-rating group assessed two forthcoming county bond issues: series 2020A, a $239.6 million issue whose proceeds will fund various transportation and public works projects; and 2020B, a $550 million issue that will refund and replace bonds the county issued in 2012.

Both series are backed by a lien on revenues from the countywide half-percent sales surtax known as the “half-penny,” which voters approved in 2002 along with projects collectively called the People’s Transportation Plan.

The AA rating, Fitch personnel wrote, reflects Miami-Dade’s bond structure’s “resilience against revenue stress associated with the current crisis and future economic cycles [and] the historically solid rate of pledged revenue growth and favorable prospects for post-pandemic gains.”

Miami-Dade’s revenue growth has been “very healthy” but will “face challenges” because, although the county’s economy is “large and diverse,” it remains “sensitive to downturns in tourism, trade and transportation.”

Huge hits to the county’s leisure and hospitality sectors, closures of hotels and travel destinations and steep falloffs in air and cruise travel, compounded by a high poverty rate and a “significant commercial real estate” tax base with a “volatile track record” is cause for near-term uncertainty, Fitch personnel wrote.

That uncertainty is underpinned by ongoing coronavirus-related problems, particularly in the US, where, in its baseline scenario, Fitch expected ‘sharp economic contractions” in the first half of 2020 “at a speed and depth that is unprecedented since World War II.”

Full economic recovery to conditions equal to fourth-quarter 2019, the report said, isn’t anticipated until mid-2022.

“The South Florida economy is exhibiting larger declines in consumer spending and a higher number of newly reported Covid cases compared to the state and US,” Fitch personnel wrote. “While the near-term outlook appears weak, the county’s economy has demonstrated an ability to bounce back from past challenges leveraging various intrinsic strengths including its deep trade and transportation infrastructure, access to Latin American markets and a resilient demand for domestic and international tourism.”

Fitch’s assessment came roughly two weeks after Miami-Dade commissioners voted 10-2 in favor of the bond issues. Joe Martinez and Jean Monestime casting the two “no” votes. Xavier Suarez was absent.

A memo from Deputy Mayor Ed Marquez said the 2020A series, which will reach full maturity in July 2050, will fund:

■$128.6 million in Metrorail-specific projects.

■$42.2 million in bus-related projects.

■$20 million in Metromover-specific projects.

■$16 million for public works, including arterial roadway, neighborhood infrastructure, road widening, rights-of-way acquisition, safety, traffic management system and smart signal upgrades.

■$12 million for park-and ride projects.

■$10.7 million in infrastructure renewal.

■$6.5 million in Metromover and Metrorail projects.

■$4 million for miscellaneous projects

■Less than $200,000 in Smart Plan projects.

The 2020B series, which will refund outstanding bonds while not prolonging their July 2042 final maturity, Mr. Marquez wrote, will save the county $60.2 million, or 12.9% of the amount of the refunded bonds.

One Response to Ratings of new Miami-Dade Transit bonds indicate ‘resilience’

  1. Antonio Alfonso

    August 12, 2020 at 12:41 pm

    And also if you cut half the people that make over 100,000.00 dollars a year and even more so the ones that make over 200,000.00 and place that money in an interest savings account the county would have enough money to fund other transportation projects . its not ethical that some people in county Government make more money than the secretary of state of the United States.