Recent Comments


The Newspaper for the Future of Miami
Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
Front Page » Opinion » Six pivotal decisions vital before restoring marine stadium

Six pivotal decisions vital before restoring marine stadium

Written by on August 15, 2017
Six pivotal decisions vital before restoring marine stadium

An architect has listed more than 50 uses for a restored Miami Marine Stadium, which is heartening, but before the city tries to actually restore the stadium it has six pivotal decisions to make.

The list of possible uses includes many that would be financial failures.

So restoration must follow a solid business plan that outlines not only principal uses but who would operate the stadium and under what payment terms, who would ensure finances to maintain and keep it open, what nearby city properties would be included under the stadium’s umbrella, and how the city would ensure a Good Neighbor Policy with Key Biscayne, which stadium events could isolate.

None of those decisions is the purview of an architect. Nor should a city manager who is unlikely to be in his job long after the fall election be deciding.

This one falls into the lap of a new mayor and city commissioners who will be playing musical chairs this fall as well. Today is a time when going slowly is the wisest course.

Outgoing Mayor Tomás Regalado told Miami Today eight months ago that four highly reputable venue operators – the Miami Heat, Miami Dolphins, Live Nation and SMG – had all inquired informally about running the restored stadium. That interest, like the list of possible stadium uses, is heartening for those concerned about the site’s future.

But city parameters for stadium uses and ground rules for what the city expects an operator of the city property to do and what that operator must pay to the city in return will certainly alter the list of potential bidders to run the site, perhaps adding more or subtracting some that have inquired so far.

For example, it makes a huge difference whether the city emphasizes boat races, which were once the stadium’s primary use, or concerts, or beauty pageants, or business meetings, or air races.

And the city certainly should not decide that all 50-plus uses on the list or others to be found are equal, if only because a restored stadium still must be tailored in advance for its users.

There will be no pageant dressing rooms if the stadium doesn’t provide them from the outset, no provisions for global media facilities without planning, no boxing and wrestling events without a ring, no concerts without a floating stage, no summer camp without proper facilities, and so on. Each potential use adds to cost, and there isn’t space to give primacy to every use at once.

Equally important, no stadium operator wants to handle all of these 50-plus disparate projects, and financial return will be vital to both operators and a city that will have to pay for stadium upkeep.

If the city sets up a stadium foundation and board, as it should, the foundation will count on revenue from events to fund the stadium in perpetuity – remember, the stadium closed its doors after Hurricane Andrew in 1992, but it was bleeding money for at least five years before the hurricane hit, money that came out of taxes, because no boat races were run in those years.

There was no reserve fund then for stadium care and restoration. There should be in the future. The $45 million in borrowing that city voters have authorized is only for a one-time restoration, not to fund operations, maintenance or upgrades. And wise city officials will tap stadium revenues to help repay those bonds.

Mayor Regalado ran for office eight years ago with marine stadium restoration as a primary campaign plank. It’s logical that he wants a restoration now as his legacy.

But it’s even more logical to nail down business plans to keep the stadium open in perpetuity before doing site work. Will a so-called flex park around the stadium be part of the package, and how will it be used – we were promised soccer fields when it was built, but the city manager has since told us the fields are impossible there.

Before we move forward with a concrete restoration based on hopes for 50-plus uses that surely aren’t all practicable either, city officials need to present to a future mayor and commission potential answers to the key questions: what are the best site uses, what lands are included, what financial terms does the city seek, who are potential bidders to handle the chosen uses, how will Key Biscayne be protected and what entity – city hall or a foundation – will oversee the operators, the sites and the money?

Without those answers in advance, a restored stadium will weigh heavily on future taxpayers and is unlikely to fulfill its promise for any of the 50-plus uses.

5 Responses to Six pivotal decisions vital before restoring marine stadium

  1. DC Copeland

    August 16, 2017 at 1:50 pm

    All good points that need to be addressed. Re the boat and air races; there may be as little as 4 major events a year if the American Power Boat Association and Red Bull agree to open and close their seasons at the Marine Stadium. Those races would garner big audiences and media coverage. Even so, those events should become sacrosanct in any vendor’s agenda when it comes to booking events at the stadium. As for a floating stage, may I suggest this economical proposal that taps into the stadium’s unique laid-back history of encouraging boaters to anchor their boats around the original floating stage (a barge): In this example, only one stage is shown but the idea is to tie multiples up for the size of the show.

  2. Peter Ehrlich

    August 16, 2017 at 5:24 pm

    Truth. $45 Million? Plus, possibly many millions in ongoing operating losses? We hope City of Miami officials and voters take a hard look at all the projections. We love Virginia Key and we love the Historic Marine Stadium Basin but we hope smart fiscal decisions will prevail.

  3. Mark Stein

    August 18, 2017 at 1:32 pm

    This is all well and good yet how can the venue succeed with boat show taking the best months of the year for a mere 1.1 million? That is not money these days. Even today the marine stadium area is blocked by the tent frames boat show has not removed. This is a city park turned into a private venue.

    Miami needs good business neighbors and boat show is not a good neighbor. The jobs are low paying temporary jobs. Hotels will still be used even if the show takes place at a different location. The few local businesses on the island are all closed on what should be a busy President’s Day weekend. I am told they do not get reimbursed for their losses.

    How is that just or good for Miami? Not even the restaurants make money as boat show uses its own food service contractors. This is just a bad deal for Miami. This from someone that used to wait anxiously each year for the boat show to come to town. Between the parking and bad politics I am soured on this event. Now I just go to the Ft. Lauderdale Boat Show. It is operated by a different entity than Miami.

    • DC Copeland

      August 18, 2017 at 2:31 pm

      I agree. A restoration of the Marine Stadium means the boat show has to go. And it can take that Frankenstein monster called a “flex park” with it.

  4. John Howe

    August 22, 2017 at 11:59 pm

    As a former member of the boat racing club that utilized the stadium “back in the day” I can tell you it would be very difficult to conduct a boat race due to the fact that old pit area is now a marina. The marina would have to be shut down during the days of racing.Pit on the other side of the stadium also has it’s drawbacks, one of which it would take up a lot of the parking lot. Where would you park say a thousand spectator cars? There wasn’t really enough parking with the old pit area during the Unlimited hydroplane events. A lot of cars had to park alongside the causeway. Also the lagoon is now to shallow for Unlimited events, and the Unlimited racing series is in pretty rough shape financially at this point. Hopefully they will be able to recover some how and continue.

    BTW, there were indeed races at the stadium years before the hurricane, which really had no effect on the structure itself. A lot of us club members saw the cracks forming in it years before. There was indeed 2 racing events after the stadium was closed. A unlimited event, and a limited event. At both events, the stadium was closed, much to the chagrin of the paying spectators.