The Newspaper for the Future of Miami
Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
Front Page » Communities » Marinas on Virginia Key get rejection slip

Marinas on Virginia Key get rejection slip

Written by on July 5, 2016
Marinas on Virginia Key get rejection slip

Start from scratch.

That’s the advice to Miami city commissioners from the new Virginia Key Advisory Board, to throw out all pending proposals for marinas on Virginia Key and start again from square one.

The advisory board is wasting no time diving into deep waters and taking action on major issues.

On June 29, at only its third meeting, the board voted to recommend the city throw out all proposals for marinas on the barrier island, request new proposals and require that all proposals conform to the official Virginia Key Master Plan adopted by city commissioners July 22, 2010.

The resolution passed. Steve Kneapler and Esther Alonso voted ‘no,’ and Spencer Crowley III abstained.

The city owns most of the barrier island, connected to the mainland and Key Biscayne by the Rickenbacker Causeway, including Miami Marine Stadium.

The marina that fills the smaller basin northwest of the abandoned stadium is operated under an old lease. More than a year ago, the city began looking for a new operator.

On June 15, 2015, the Department of Real Estate and Asset Management requested proposals for an integrated package to “plan, redesign, renovate or redevelop, lease, manage and operate a mixed-use waterfront facility including, but not limited to, two marinas, a boatyard, dock master’s office, ship’s store, dry storage, wetslip docks, and at least one restaurant.”

The request went through several addenda, including one that called for adding 300 wet slips and the possibility of locating some of those slips in the big basin fronting the stadium.

Three companies submitted proposals. After evaluation by a selection committee, Virginia Key LLC, also known as RCI Group, was chosen.

The second- and third-place bidders filed protests but the city commission rejected them.

RCI Group’s $100 million redevelopment plan includes a large dry-storage building with an automated system to retrieve boats, a new layout for docks in the smaller basin, a two-story building for restaurant uses, a public baywalk and more.

At its meeting May 24, the advisory board discussed calling on the city to toss out all marina proposals and start the process again. Instead, it passed a resolution requesting the city commission not allow additional wet slips in the big basin.

From the outset, members of the advisory board haven’t been shy about expressing frustration and concerns about what’s taken place on the island since the 2010 master plan was adopted.

Some board members have railed against administrative staff about inconsistent master plan documents, and about changes to the island in recent years, including inviting the Miami International Boat Show to host its annual event on the land and water surrounding the idled stadium.

At the June 29 meeting, City Manager Daniel Alfonso asked the advisory board to listen to a presentation from the winning proposer for marina operations.

An architect with Arquitectonica represented the RCI Group and presented a slide show on the plan.

The proposal would have parking spaces in the lower levels of the main structure, with storage of boats above. The site plan calls for four pedestrian access points near the planned marina.

The RCI proposal also includes grand stairs overlooking Biscayne Bay and a viable public baywalk with continuous shade, the representative said.

Board members questioned RCI about plans for wet slips in the main basin.

Carter N. McDowell, an attorney representing RCI, said the developer had designs that included some wet slips in the basin but had alternative plans without slips in the basin, taking the basin’s historic designation into consideration.

One plan showed 151 wet slips in the basin, said Mr. McDowell, but the removal of those proposed slips would not impact the overall development proposal from RCI.

Mr. McDowell said he was aware that city commissioners have decided they don’t want any slips in the basin, and he said RCI understands and would comply with those wishes.

Advisory board member Lynn B. Lewis asked him if RCI would promise in writing that it wouldn’t pursue the 151 wet slips in the basin.

“We’ve said we’d not put them in,” said Mr. McDowell, pointing out that no lease has been negotiated.

“We don’t have a lease yet,” he said.

Ms. Lewis pushed the point, asking again if a promise would be made.

“Yes, we’re happy to not put the slips there,” Mr. McDowell said.

It didn’t seem to matter when the advisory board later voted to have the commission toss out the entire request for proposals.

Board member Vinson Richter wanted the record to be clear: the board had played no role in the request for proposals.

“There’s no way we vetted it, accept it or endorse it,” said Mr. Richter. “We’ve seen a nice presentation. That should be it.”

The resolution recommending the commission throw out all proposals and request new proposals consistent with the official Virginia Key Master Plan included the note that the advisory board did not favor any of the current bidders.

The city commission has scheduled a special meeting for 9 a.m. July 20 to decide the fate of the current request for proposals.

The city commission established the advisory board in January. It is to advise the commission on the mission, vision, business plan, governance and operation of the island and basin, the implementation of the Virginia Key 2010 Master Plan and the restoration of the stadium.

4 Responses to Marinas on Virginia Key get rejection slip

  1. DC Copeland

    July 6, 2016 at 6:58 am

    Throw out all the proposals and start over. How the respected Arquitectonica firm could align itself with the developer is embarrassing, especially when anyone who lives here and cares about the community knows that the marina basin is sacrosanct and not to be touched. It’s as if the local Miami architecture firm is completely clueless about the stadium’s historic designation, the structure’s place in architecture, the Matheson family covenant with the city, and the Virginia Key masterplan which went through a long charrette process with citizens to get it just right.

    • Miriam

      July 14, 2016 at 1:28 am

      Arquitectonica only cares about the money. Yes, they are respected but $1 billion dollars is a lot of mula.

      funny though… throughout all these crazy proposed or imposed development in Virginia Key, not one plan offers to restore the stadium.

      Ill be out of town on the 20th but please share this info with everyone and go to the meeting to voice your rejection of this disastrous plan and its total disrespect for what we, the locals agreed on with this city in 2010!

  2. Bob Deresz

    July 6, 2016 at 11:00 am

    The entire Large Basin needs to be removed from the Proposal of the Marina on Virginia Key. This area appears to be three times the area that RCI wishes to place the additional 151 Wet Slips.
    The Proposal should allow only 25 feet of bay bottom off the Seawall’s edge in the Basin area.
    5-10 years from now, the winning bidder may claim to build a Mooring Field out in the area or even rental residences on anchored barges if this massive area in the Basin is left in their control.

    Bob Deresz

  3. Miriam

    July 14, 2016 at 1:31 am

    This area is not only important because of the basin. Thousands of birds nest there every year. Many different type of birds need the quiet area to nest.

    All the city needs to do is restore the Marine Stadium, build some walkways from materials that are environmentally conscientious, put trees up (since they chopped all of the ones that were there), add some benches, picnic tables etc and that is it! We don’t need another bayside (in fact, the city already sold us the idea of renewing the bayside, remember? with the fiasco of the Skyrise?)…

    leave it natural and open all year to the public.

    Stop spending our tax dollars and things we don’t need or want.

    Stop the thievery!