Archives

  • www.xinsurance.com
Advertisement
The Newspaper for the Future of Miami
Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
Front Page » Top Stories » Miami targets even larger billboards throughout urban core

Miami targets even larger billboards throughout urban core

Written by on October 18, 2022
  • www.miamitodayepaper.com
Advertisement
Miami targets even larger billboards throughout urban core

While a city board has caused a major delay to the Miami City Commission’s plan to allow outdoor advertising signs in some of the city’s premier waterfront parks, the commission followed with a vote advancing an even more aggressive measure allowing large digital ad signs on city property.

Before the commission Oct. 13 were two related items: The final reading of an amendment to the sign ordinance to allow advertising signs in three bayfront parks, sponsored by Joe Carollo; and the first reading of an amendment to the sign ordinance allowing larger digital advertising signs at numerous city-owned properties, sponsored by Alex Diaz de la Portilla.

Mr. Carollo’s proposal could not move forward because on Oct. 11 the Planning, Zoning and Appeals Board (PZAB) voted to defer the legislation 90 days.

After discussion of the proposal and the rights and authority of PZAB, the commission voted to withdraw Mr. Carollo’s proposal. It had passed unanimously on first reading Sept. 22.

Mr. Carollo’s legislation would allow advertising signs up to 20 by 20 feet in Bayfront Park, Maurice A. Ferré Park, and Virginia Key Beach Park.

The original advertising sign ordinance allows outdoor advertising signs at three city-owned sites: James L. Knight Center, Olympia Theater and Building/Gusman Center for the Performing Arts, and Miami Children’s Museum.

Mr. Diaz de la Portilla’s proposal would add Bayfront Park; Perez Art Museum Miami (PAMM); Adrienne Arsht Center for the Performing Arts of Miami-Dade County; Maurice A. Ferré Park; and “Any government-owned location within the Omni or SEOPW CRAs (Southeast Overtown/Park West Community Redevelopment Agency).”

The following locations would be deemed Digital Free Standing Sign Sites: Bayfront Park; PAMM; and Maurice A. Ferré Park. Signs up to 1,800 square feet would be allowed.

The purpose of both amendments to the city sign ordinance notes, “… the City of Miami seeks to bring in necessary revenue to maintain and improve government-owned properties within the City.”

City Attorney Victoria Méndez explained that state law requires these types of signs be reviewed by the PZAB before commission can grant final approval.

Per city code, the PZAB can defer an item for up to 90 days, and provisions allow two additional deferrals up to 45 days each.

Mr. Diaz de la Portilla was not happy hearing this and eventually asked Ms. Mendez to draft an amendment stripping authority of PZAB by only allowing one deferral to its next meeting, which must be within 30 days. If PZAB does not hear a matter, it would constitute a denial and move on to city commission.

City Manager Art Noriega wanted both proposals withdrawn, but Mr. Diaz de la Portilla fought for a vote on first reading for his proposal.

Mr. Diaz de la Portilla said, “I want to move forward with it. It’s first reading. Mr. Carollo had his item, and he had first reading. He has a vision for what he wants to do, I have my vision for what’s to happen in the Omni CRA area … and also some of the Allapattah and Health District areas.

“I want to pass it and then we come back and deal with the whole PZAB issue and how we’re going to change the law … but I want to get the ball rolling,” he said.

Manolo Reyes again voiced concerns about the impact of large lighted signs on city residents. He was the lone no vote to approve Mr. Diaz de la Portilla’s proposal on first reading.

9 Responses to Miami targets even larger billboards throughout urban core

  1. Visual Pollution

    October 19, 2022 at 10:11 am

    Billboards are disgusting. Billboards are visual pollution. Billboards only exist to distract residents, drivers and tourists. It is predictable that Commissioner Alex Diaz de la Portilla would be pushing something this harmful. Billboard companies are known for making large campaign contributions. Ex-commissioner Marc Sarnoff is now a lobbyist for billboard companies.

  2. Richard R-P

    October 19, 2022 at 10:57 am

    One word – sickening.

  3. Shame

    October 19, 2022 at 11:33 am

    Another terrible idea from Alex Diaz de la Portilla. Which billboard lobbyists are behind Alex DLP?

  4. Jessica

    October 19, 2022 at 12:35 pm

    I vote no for more billboards.

  5. Gerwyn Flax

    October 19, 2022 at 5:15 pm

    Put it all on hold. Draft a referendum and have the entire county vote on the issue. Let the tax payers decide. I have no doubt that this will quickly wither away, and hopefully so will Joe Corollo and his fellow goons.

  6. Behind the Door?

    October 20, 2022 at 6:26 am

    Will “Miami Today” journalists uncover ex-commish Marc Sarnoff as being the secret lobbyist behind the Carollo-Alex DLP billboard scheme? And which Assistant City Attorney drafted the latest Pro-Billboard legislation? Was it Sarnoff crony…

  7. Ian Murphy

    October 20, 2022 at 3:32 pm

    In Brazil in the city of San Paulo billboards got out of control. So the Mayor banned all billboards. Commission vote was 49-1. 10,000 billboards came down. Residents and tourists could finally see the beautiful architecture again.

  8. Lans Bennett

    October 22, 2022 at 11:24 pm

    Why are City of Miami Commissioners Joe Carollo, Alex Diaz de la Portilla, Ken Russell and Christine King so desperate to approve massive billboards in public parks facing busy Biscayne Blvd? Is it because billboard companies like Outfront Media make massive campaign contributions?

  9. Ty Gibson

    November 12, 2022 at 10:27 pm

    Corruption? Are all the Miami elected officials being bought off? How much are the billboard companies paying them?

  • www.miamitodayepaper.com
Advertisement