The Newspaper for the Future of Miami
Connect with us:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin
Front Page » Top Stories » Miami-Dade MPO gives Beach Corridor project Priority 1 status

Miami-Dade MPO gives Beach Corridor project Priority 1 status

Written by on August 9, 2016
Miami-Dade MPO gives Beach Corridor project Priority 1 status

The Beach Corridor project, which aims to connect Miami to Miami Beach with public transit, is quickly moving forward, despite the latter city’s controversial decision to explore a locally funded initiative on its side of Biscayne Bay.

The Miami-Dade Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) voted unanimously July 21 to make the Beach Corridor a Priority 1 project, which means it joins the other five corridors of the Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit plan as a front-burner item.

“Let me say that we have truly reached a major step in moving our transportation plan forward,” said Jean Monestime, chair of both the Miami-Dade Board of County Commissioners and the MPO, when the item was passed.

“All six corridors are part of our development program now and are included into our mass transit plan,” he said.

All of the parties to the Beach Corridor, which included Miami, Miami-Dade County, Miami Beach and the Florida Department of Transportation, have signed a memorandum of agreement that lays out how the project will be executed, said Aileen Boucle, MPO executive director, after the meeting.

Miami-Dade County will take the lead during the environmental and design phase, which is already funded, she said.

“The parties have all agreed to the inter-operability of the system, with intermodal connections,” she said. On the mainland, the connections will probably be at Government Center and in Midtown, while on Miami Beach a likely location will be at Alton Road and Fifth Street. It hasn’t been decided what mode or modes of transportation will be used.

“This is a significant milestone for the MPO, as it’s the last of the six corridors to be amended to Priority 1 status,” Ms. Boucle said. “Until it’s a Priority 1, it hasn’t commenced yet. All of the projects are starting to follow the federal process, so that now we can get our share of federal and state funding.” Work will begin on environmental documents for this corridor by year’s end, she said.

The Strategic Miami Area Rapid Transit plan, also known as SMART, identifies six corridors for improvements. The others are the:

•East-West Corridor, along State Road 836;

•Kendall Corridor, from Dadeland to Southwest 162 Avenue;

•North Corridor, along Northwest 27th Avenue from west of downtown to Northwest 215th Street;

•Northeast Corridor, from downtown to Aventura, largely along the Florida East Coast Railway tracks; and

•South Corridor, from Dadeland to Southwest 344th Street, along US 1.

It proposes various modes of transportation for each corridor, includes express-bus routes for “first and last mile” connectivity, and posits that all six corridors can proceed simultaneously.

Miami-Dade County has said it will apply for federal and state funding for its part of the Beach Corridor, and Ms. Boucle said Miami Beach’s exploration of a local alternative is not a detriment to that process.

But Miami Beach Mayor Philip Levine has derided the federal process as being too slow. A July 16 press release by City Manager Jimmy Morales confirms that the city is in negotiations with Greater Miami Tramlink Partners, an affiliate of the French company Alstom, to initiate light-rail service.

If those negotiations fail, the city will then move on to the other two proposers, Connect Miami Beach and Miami Beach Mobility Partners, the release said.

“From a federal funding perspective, it makes far more practical sense to coordinate with Miami-Dade County and jointly apply,” said Al Maloof, managing partner of GJB Consulting, an affiliate of the Genovese Joblove & Battista law firm. The federal government has special evaluation criteria that take into account a project’s regional impact, he said. “It will all be looked at collectively, and this may signal that Miami Beach has its own agenda.”

“The county should be driving this,” said Mr. Maloof, who is a member of the American Public Transportation Association. “First and foremost, we want to assess inter-operability, and how the system will work in the region it serves.” If a public-private-partnership is the financial model Miami Beach chooses, that should be supported by a public referendum before any city dollars are committed, he added.

Nevertheless, he hailed it as progress, driven in large part by County Mayor Carlos Gimenez “who has been the most effective advocate for improving mobility in the region,” and Alice Bravo, director of the county’s Transportation and Public Works Department, “who has done an extraordinary job.”

“In order to get funding, the federal government significantly prefers everyone to be on the same page,” said Neal Sklar, a partner in the Peckar & Abramson law firm and organizer of last September’s P3 transportation conference, which explored public-private partnerships.

“Miami Beach’s moving forward could result in the federal government not providing funds, though Miami-Dade County can still pursue those funds,” he said. “It’s a long process.”

There are difficult aspects to the project, in that it crosses Biscayne Bay, “but that just takes engineering,” Mr. Sklar said. Mr. Gimenez and Ms. Bravo “are firmly committed to making this connection.”

His preference would be to see the entire project done in the P3 model, which he called “the wave of the future.”

But that would require all of the partners to get together, create a proposal, and shop it to the private sector, Mr. Sklar said. “Let the private sector come in and explain how best to do this,” he said. “P3s are a significant tool in the arsenal of officials who want to get public transportation projects done, and they should be explored.”

4 Responses to Miami-Dade MPO gives Beach Corridor project Priority 1 status

  1. DC Copeland

    August 10, 2016 at 8:12 am

    P3 the Baylink portion to Genting. They can afford to build the whole thing. Plus it will help bring people and money to their project on the bay, whatever that will be. As for Miami Beach rushing towards a system that may scuttle any cooperation from the Feds for funding, blame it on that city’s Alpha Male Mayor, a wild-eyed conductor at the wheel of a runaway train rushing towards derailment by the rising sea.

  2. anon

    August 10, 2016 at 8:28 am

    “It hasn’t been decided what mode or modes of transportation will be used.” Miami Dade at this point hasn’t even decided if the miami to MB segment will be trolley, bus rapid transit, light rail or gondola. And yet this article’s author criticizes MB’s decision as “controversial” for moving ahead with a transportation system for the beach?! This is insanity. Kudos to MB for moving ahead. Miami Dade will bicker over details for another 2 decades while MB builds a world class trolley system for its residents. Ms Lackner’s opinion that the system in MB is controversial is unfounded. What is controversial is that the county stole so much money from the residents in a sham sales tax scam and built none of the promised new mass transit lines.

  3. Robert Lansburgh

    August 11, 2016 at 3:17 pm

    Miami Beach and Alstom have led the way and has promised its counterparts across the bay the following: Construction of a street car that will go 5th street, Washington avenue, 17th street, and Alton road, 1.5 miles north-south and 1/2 miles east-west, in a circle around south beach.

    One must question if rail is the correct application for moving people such short distances. The cost to the landscape, 24 feet of all roads removed for 6 train tracks, the costs to pedestrians and bicyclists, the $500,000,000 to build and $20,000,000 annual cost to operate.
    South beach is 3500 households and this loop does not serve their needs. A true open and honest conversation has not transpired, its been closed doors.
    Please view our facebook page or stop the train Miami beach on facebook

    The citizens are being asked to ultimately pay for a 2 to 3 billion dollar train system and have been largely kept in the dark, this is not the way it will work.

  4. Gayle Durham

    August 11, 2016 at 10:43 pm

    Until the county finalizes a connection between Miami and Miami Beach (which is 10 years away) I prefer that Miami Beach nix a tracked streetcar and instead expand the existing TROLLEY because teh TROLLEY is free for passengers and is a bus on wheels with flexible route option, including circular and east to west. That was the original mass transit plan presented by the city to our homeowners association. We were told the contract expires this December between Miami and Miami Beach for the $.25 Local Bus in Miami Beach, creating the perfect opportunity for the Miami Beach TROLLEY to take over all routes (and get reimbursed by Miami).

    Disadvantage of STREETCAR – super expensive, track is on a permanent route, will cost passengers a fee to ride it, stations are more spread out than trolley, will remove shade trees, make sidewalks more narrow, remove on-street parking, remove proposed parklets.