|
|
 |
|
Miami
commission to weigh two roads for parking authority
By
Candi Calkins
Miami
commissioners have agreed to consider two alternate scenarios for
the city's parking system.
In
either, changes would alter the independent parking agency that takes
in more than $12 million annually in revenues from garages and on-street
meters.
Commissioners
in September will review two proposed charter amendments introduced
last week by Mayor Joe Carollo. If commissioners approve, at least
one would go on the November ballot.
Commissioners
asked for an amendment to abolish the parking agency either through
privatization or by a merger with the city.
A
second proposal would change the makeup of the Off-Str6">
Art
Noriega, executive director of Miami Parking System, said Monday that
while commissioners probably will put a parking proposal on the November
ballot, "I have a lot of confidence that the voters, when they
go to the polls, will side with keeping the authority in its current
setup."
Parking
officials plan a presentation to commissioners Sept. 7 "to basically
substantiate our current existence and justify the revenue we return
to the city," Mr. he said.
Since
1997, following the onset of the city's financial crisis, the parking
agency has paid more than $2 million annually to city coffers.
While
the agency is to send $2.3 million to the city this year and next,
Mr. Noriega said the agency will exceed its scheduled contribution
this year by $300,000 due to higher than anticipated revenues. With
revenues rising, he said he expects a similar surplus for the city
next year.
The
mayor last week advocated abolition of the agency, saying more money
would be available to the city if the agency were privatized or placed
under the city manager's supervision.
"I
know the City of Miami is not receiving millions of dollars more every
year that we should be receiving," Mr. Carollo said. "We
do not even have the right to audit this organization."
Commissioners
say they are reluctant to turn the agency into another city department.
Willy Gort, for one, said the agency has lower operating costs outside
the city. A merger would bring the agency's employees under city unions,
raising salaries, pensions and other costs.
"To
make it a city department might not be what we're looking at,"
Mr. Gort said.
Joe
Sanchez said he also might consider privatizing the agency but wanted
to know the effect on bond ratings. He said he also fears higher parking
rates and a loss of the ability to build new garages.
"I'm
willing to let the people decide," Mr. Sanchez said.
Arthur
Teele said he would not support abolishing the agency but supported
the second proposal, a reorganization of the Off-Street Parking Board
that controls how agency funds are spent.
"The
question as far as I'm concerned is a question of direction in government,"
he said.
Mr.
Teele said an outstanding bond debt of $14 million could be an obstacle
to abolishing the agency. Although he also favored privatization,
he said, analysis of wages and operating costs is needed.ù”-98
8P
justify the revenue we return to the city," he said.
|
|